Skip to main content

Why I chose the Canon EOS 6D

My main camera bag
In 2006 I switched from Nikon to Canon. I was tired of waiting for Nikon to bring out a full frame DSLR. The camera I had been waiting for from Nikon, the D700 was eventually launched in July 2008 but by then I’d invested in Canon gear.

My trusty Canon 5D has been my companion through many an adventure and has consistently provided portfolio quality images which have met the most rigorous demands of publishers and agencies. Mind you, images shot with my first DSLR, the 6 megapixel Nikon D70 are still selling through stock libraries. It’s not about megapixels!

My wife, professional photographer Magda Indigo stayed with Nikon. She bought the Nikon D7000 when it came out. In 2011 I also invested in a D7000. I wanted to try filming with a DSLR and really liked the ergonomics and handling of the Nikon, as well as the superb quality, which matches that of the 5D full frame. The D7000 is fast, light to carry and a I thoroughly enjoyed shooting with my old Nikon prime lenses from my film days; 24mm and 85mm, as well as using the new Nikon 50mm and versatile 18-105mm lenses.

For a while I have worked simultaneously with Nikon and Canon systems but it was becoming a lot to lug around and with baggage limitations on flights, also a logistical challenge. In terms of quality there’s nothing to choose between the two brands. Photographers make images, not cameras. Having said that, certain cameras offer more versatile options and help you achieve better image quality.

I have a superb range of Canon L lenses. This ultimately was the reason for choosing a Canon DSLR. Having made that decision the next one was, which Canon DSLR? I like working with full frame.

Why the  Canon EOS 6D instead of the EOS 5D MK III?


  • It costs significantly less than the 5D MKIII.
  • The 6D has the same chip and offers a slightly better image quality in lab conditions than the EOS 5D MKIII (in practical terms nobody will see the difference).
  • The 6D offers slightly better dynamic range (0.4 f stops), and better low light performance (less noise). I like shooting in available light and the 6D is a class leader in DSLRs in this category so an important plus point for me.
  • The body is slightly smaller and 20% lighter, but when you stick a heavy L lens on the camera does it make all that much real world difference? I’m not sure that it does.
  • The built in wifi and ability to shoot remotely from a smartphone or tablet is a pleasant feature.
  • Built in GPS is nice for travel photos.

The 6D is designed for portrait and travel photographers which is what I do. If I shot sport or fast moving wildlife then having more autofocus points, faster reaction times and frame rates of the 5D III would perhaps have swayed the decision in its favour. As it stands there is nothing in the extra features of the 5D III that would merit spending the extra cash, which I’d rather use to to fund travel to places where I can make new images.

I hope that my story illustrates that choosing the right equipment very much depends on what you want to do, your budget and how you have built your system up over time. If you are starting out then think about the whole system that you would like to buy into. You can’t go wrong with any of the major brands, so it comes down to personal preference. Lenses are the single most important component of your system and over time you will find yourself using less and less gear. At the moment I am now only using three lenses with my 6D, which I am enjoying, and I have the 5D MK1 as my backup. If I need more equipment for a shoot I hire it.

I am certainly not obsessed with having the latest and 'best' of everything. Good images are made by photographers not cameras. Keep it simple.

Till soon,
Paul
www.indigo2photography.co.uk/paul-portfolio.htm

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Approach to taking a portrait

Portrait of Amitabh Bachchan. Click on the image to see larger version. Every portrait is different but there are also elements which are the same, whether you’re shooting the famous or the locally famous. Fame is of course all relative. It depends on profession, accomplishments or media celebrity status. Whoever the ‘famous’ individual is there are millions of people in the world who will never have heard them. For example I photographed the legendary Indian Bollywood actor Amitabh Bachchan, who amongst his many accolades was awarded the Legion d'Honneur, the highest civilian award of France. But I’m positive that many people in North America will not have heard of him – although he has more fans than Tom Cruise, Jack Nicholson and Robert De Niro put together. I find that however well known a person is cracking through egos and insecurities is really important when it comes to getting authentic strong portraits. However I hasten to add that when it came to photographing Amitabh th
1 comment
Read more

Capturing the truth: The power of documentary photography to shape public opinion

Photographer, writer and artist, Paul Indigo (Photo by Magda Indigo ) Documentary photography is more important than ever because it plays a critical role in informing and shaping public opinion, particularly in today's fast-paced, information-saturated world. With the rise of social media and the 24-hour news cycle, we are bombarded with images and information daily. It can be difficult to separate fact from fiction. From a trusted source, documentary photography counterbalances the often sensationalised and biased coverage of social and political issues. Documentary photography can challenge dominant narratives and foster greater understanding and empathy by presenting a nuanced, humanistic perspective on complex issues. It can highlight underreported and marginalised issues, giving voice to those who are often ignored or silenced. In a world where many people feel disenfranchised and marginalised, documentary photography can help to create a sense of community and solidarity by
Post a Comment
Read more

The portrait photographer's motivation

Easy access to the Internet and digital photography has resulted in an ever growing number of photographers uploading their images for comments and ratings from peers. Online communities evolve and these mini-societies each have their pecking order, internal groups and communal preferences. Photographers learn from each other. On sites that have a rating system there is often pressure to conform to certain styles, techniques and even subject matter. Although I participate in numerous sites (it's great fun), I recognise the danger of becoming a herd animal and losing the edge of individual creativity. There will always be the creatives that lead the way and the imitators that can only try to follow in their footsteps. This lead me to think about classifying photographers according their inner motivation. So as a bit of fun here are a few different types: The innovator Driven to always find something new, different and creative. Wants to be leading edge. Motivated by creative satisfa
6 comments
Read more